Executive Summary:
Fundamentally,
the Middle East region of the world is a convoluted and capricious region
with avalanche of historical crises such as the Arab-Israeli Wars, Iran-Iraqi
War, the Gulf Wars, the Suez Canal Crisis, etc. Currently, the Syrian War,
ISIL/ISIS terrorism and discussion on nuclearisation project of Iran are
front burners. Importantly concerted efforts at solving the impasse between
USA and Iran over the latter’s nuclear programme culminated into the Nuclear
Deal Iran signed with the World Power (P5+1). Whereas, Israeli Prime Minister
addressed the US Congress in March 2015 before it was finally
consummated. The chief aim of this
discourse is to interrogate Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to the US Congress in
March 2015 particularly within the framework of the strategic significance of
a nuclear-armed Iran to the security of the Middle East. In this historical
speech Netanyahu believed that the deal between Iran and world powers (P5+1)
is a bad deal. Netanyahu remarked on the impending precarious situation his
nation (Israel) is about to face if the Nuclear Deal with Iran is
crystallized. Critically, Netanyahu established the threat poses by Iran to
other states within the international system, particularly in the Middle
East. This conversation pointedly mentioned the reactions of Saudi Arab and
Turkey. In addition to this, Netanyahu beamed more lights on Iran’s destabilising
activities in the Middle East. He reinforced the claim of Iran’s support for
global terrorism particularly in the Middle East. Premised on the mutual
mistrust and misconception between Iran and her neighbours in the Middle
East, there is no doubt proliferation of nuclear arms in the Middle East will
be one of the shades of reactions and counter-reactions to any attempt on the
part of Iran to develop nuclear bombs. This conversation noted that this
Iran’s nuclear deal could precipitate a rift or row between the USA and
Israel particularly based on the public criticism of the US president by the
Israeli prime minister. Arguably, this portends a precarious situation within
the framework of the security of the Middle East. Fundamentally, the March 2015 speech of the
Israeli Prime Minister is our main source, nonetheless other sources and
extant literatures were also interrogated.
|
Tuesday, 25 April 2017
An Interrogation Of Benjamin Netanyanhu’s March 2015 Speech At The Us Congress Vis-A-Vis The Strategic Significance Of A Nuclear-Armed Iran To The Security Of The Middle East – By Johnson Sesan Michael
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)